What Is Wrongful Trading?

Wrongful trading happens when a director keeps trading after they knew, or should have known, that the company could not avoid insolvent liquidation. If a director carries on anyway and the company’s losses grow, the court can hold that director personally liable for some of those losses.

This rule protects creditors. Once a company has no real chance of survival, the law expects directors to stop making things worse. Trading on in the hope of a turnaround, without a solid plan, is exactly what wrongful trading law targets.

The Legal Basis: Section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 sets out the wrongful trading rule. It applies once a company enters insolvent liquidation. A liquidator, and sometimes an administrator, can bring a claim against a former director if they can show three things:

  • The director knew, or ought to have known, that the company had no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation.
  • The director continued to trade despite this.
  • The continued trading caused further loss to creditors.

Lawyers often call this point in time the “knowledge date”. It is rarely one dramatic moment. Courts look at the evidence as a whole: missed HMRC payments, bounced supplier invoices, board minutes, cash flow forecasts, and lender communications. Together, this evidence shows when a reasonably diligent director should have realised the company could not recover.

Wrongful Trading vs Fraudulent Trading

People often confuse these two terms, but they differ sharply in seriousness.

Wrongful trading does not require dishonesty. A director can face liability simply for ignoring warning signs, even if they genuinely believed things would improve.

Fraudulent trading is far more serious. It involves deliberately deceiving creditors or running up debts with no intention of paying them back. Fraudulent trading is a criminal offence, and prosecutors can bring criminal charges, not just a civil claim for compensation.

Who Can Be Held Responsible

Wrongful trading claims do not stop at directors listed on Companies House. They can also reach:

  • De facto directors, who act as directors without a formal appointment.
  • Shadow directors, whose instructions the board regularly follows, even without an official title.

If you make director-level decisions in practice, the law may treat you as a director for a wrongful trading claim, regardless of your job title.

What Happens if a Claim Succeeds

If a court finds a director liable for wrongful trading, it can order that director to personally contribute to the company’s losses. This money goes toward repaying creditors. The director may also face:

  • Significant personal legal costs.
  • Separate director disqualification proceedings, since conduct that leads to a wrongful trading finding often counts as “unfit conduct” under company law.
  • Reputational damage that can affect future roles as a director.

Limited company status usually protects directors from personal liability for company debts. Wrongful trading is one of the main exceptions to that protection.

Defences and How Directors Can Protect Themselves

The law gives directors a defence if they took “every step” a reasonably diligent director would take to minimise losses to creditors once insolvency looked unavoidable. In practice, directors should be able to show that they:

  • Kept accurate, up-to-date management accounts and cash flow forecasts.
  • Held regular board meetings and kept clear minutes once problems appeared.
  • Sought timely professional advice from an insolvency practitioner, accountant, or solicitor.
  • Acted honestly on that advice, after giving the adviser the full picture.
  • Considered formal options early, such as administration, a company voluntary arrangement, or an orderly wind-down, rather than trading on indefinitely.

Documented professional advice gives a director one of the strongest pieces of evidence available. It will not automatically clear a director of liability, but it shows the court that the director made reasoned decisions rather than reckless ones.

Warning Signs Directors Should Not Ignore

  • Repeatedly missing PAYE, VAT, or Corporation Tax payments.
  • Relying on personal funds to cover business shortfalls.
  • Extending payment terms with suppliers again and again.
  • Depending on a single client or contract for most of the company’s income, while that relationship weakens.
  • Auditors or accountants asking harder questions than usual about the company’s future.

None of these signs alone forces a company to stop trading immediately. Together, though, they form exactly the pattern a liquidator will later examine when deciding whether to bring a claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be personally sued for wrongful trading?

Yes. If a liquidator or administrator can prove the three elements of Section 214, a court can order you to personally contribute to the company’s losses.

Does wrongful trading always lead to disqualification?

Not always, but the two often go together. Conduct serious enough to support a wrongful trading claim often reaches the Insolvency Service as potential unfit conduct, which can trigger separate disqualification proceedings.

Is wrongful trading a criminal offence?

No. Wrongful trading is a civil matter. Fraudulent trading, which involves dishonesty, can lead to criminal prosecution.

What should I do if I think my company might be insolvent?

Get advice as early as possible from a licensed insolvency practitioner or a solicitor. Acting early, and documenting that advice, gives you the best chance of showing that you met your legal duties to creditors.

Getting Legal Advice

If you are a director worried about your company’s finances, do not wait for creditors to act. Early legal advice can help you understand your duties, protect yourself from personal liability, and choose the right formal process for your situation. Read our guide to financial law and corporate governance for the wider legal framework directors operate under, our guide to director disqualification to see how it can follow a wrongful trading finding, and our guide to getting legal advice if you are not sure where to start.

This article gives general information only. It does not constitute legal advice. Figures on disqualification trends come from published Insolvency Service data reported by third parties, and you should verify them independently. Always speak to a qualified solicitor or licensed insolvency practitioner about your specific circumstances.